What to read next
Do Sweeteners Make You Hungrier? What the Research Says
It is one of the most repeated claims in nutrition conversations: sweeteners trick your body into expecting calories, and when none arrive, you end up hungrier and eat more later. It sounds plausible. It gets shared confidently. But when researchers have actually tested it in controlled studies, it hasn't held up. Does the "Sweeteners Make You Eat More" Theory Hold Up? Mostly, no. The theory has been tested directly. The simplest test looks like this: give people a food or drink made with a low-energy sweetener, then see what they eat afterwards compared with people given the sugar version. A study published in the journal Appetite did exactly that. Participants had stevia, aspartame or sucrose before lunch and dinner, while researchers tracked their hunger, fullness and food intake. Even though the sweetener version had around 200 fewer calories, people did not eat more to make up for it. One study is one study though, which is why the bigger picture matters more. What the Larger Body of Evidence Shows A systematic review and meta-analysis published in the International Journal of Obesity pulled together the human evidence on this question. Across 129 comparisons in short-term randomised controlled trials, people who had low-energy sweeteners instead of sugar before a meal ate less overall, not more, by an average of 94 calories. Longer trials, running from four weeks to over three years, pointed the same way, with sweetener use linked to modestly lower body weight than sugar. The authors were direct: the evidence from human randomised controlled trials shows low-energy sweeteners do not increase energy intake or body weight. In plain terms, when this theory meets a controlled trial, the trial wins. It's worth noting what these trials actually measured, because it's a strong kind of test. They didn't just ask people if they felt hungry, since that's easy to get wrong. They counted what people actually ate afterwards, with food freely available. If sweeteners really did make the body chase down missing calories, this is exactly where it would show up. It didn't. So Why Does the Claim Persist? Partly because early animal studies seemed to support it. Those studies often used amounts and feeding patterns that do not reflect how people actually use sweeteners day to day. Partly because some studies simply observe habits rather than test them, and those sometimes find that people who drink diet drinks weigh more. That is a case of cause and effect running backwards: people often start using sweeteners because they are already watching their weight, not the other way around. And partly because there is a genuine scientific conversation still happening. In 2023, the World Health Organization advised against using sweeteners specifically as a weight-loss tool, since the long-term evidence for weight control is still uncertain and sweeteners alone are not a magic fix. That is a fair and worthwhile caution, and it is a different claim from "sweeteners make you hungrier." The honest reading of the evidence is that sweeteners are not a weight-loss strategy on their own, but they also do not appear to drive your appetite up the way the popular theory suggests. Worth adding for local context: sweeteners sold in Australia, including the steviol glycosides in stevia-based products, are assessed and approved for safety by Food Standards Australia New Zealand before they reach shelves. How to Read Headlines About Sweeteners Observational studies can show that two things happen together, like diet drink habits and body weight, but they can't show which one causes the other. This is exactly where the cause-and-effect mix-up happens. Animal studies are useful for understanding how something works in the body, but they often use amounts and setups far removed from someone stirring stevia into a flat white. Randomised controlled trials, where people are assigned to sweetener or sugar and everything else stays the same, are built to answer the appetite question properly. So next time a headline lands, three simple questions help: was it tested in humans, was it randomised, and did it measure what people actually ate rather than how hungry they said they felt. Studies that pass all three have been remarkably consistent, and the ones behind the scariest headlines usually have not. What This Means in Practice The simplest way to think about a sweetener is not as a health product, but as a subtraction tool. It takes the sugar out of something you were going to enjoy anyway: your morning coffee, a weekend bake, a hot chocolate at night. The sweetness stays, the sugar goes, and the research above suggests your appetite carries on as normal. Natvia Natural Sweetener is made from stevia and erythritol and swaps into tea, coffee and baking without the sugar, so you can run the test that matters most: how it works for you over a normal week. It's worth remembering what a fair test looks like in your own kitchen. One day proves nothing either way. Two or three weeks of your normal routine with the swap in place, keeping half an eye on your snacking and evenings, will tell you more about your own appetite than any headline can. Next time someone tells you sweeteners will send you raiding the pantry by 9pm, you'll know what the controlled trials actually found. Usually, the pantry stays shut.
Learn more
What Sugar Actually Does to Your Teeth, and What Helps
Everyone knows too much sugar is bad for teeth. Almost nobody can say why, and the why turns out to matter, because it changes what you would actually do about it. The short version: your teeth are not being attacked by sugar. They are being attacked by what your mouth does with it, and how often you give it the chance. How Does Sugar Cause Tooth Decay? Sugar does not dissolve teeth directly. According to Better Health Channel, millions of bacteria live in your mouth and stick to your teeth in a soft build-up called plaque. Those bacteria use the sugars in what you eat and drink to create energy, and the waste product of that process is acid. It is the acid that dissolves the mineral crystals in tooth enamel, weakening the tooth until a white spot appears, and eventually a cavity. Your mouth has a defence: saliva neutralises acid and can even repair decay in its very early stages. But saliva needs time to do its work, and this is where the story gets interesting. Why How Often You Eat Sugar Matters More Than How Much Each time sugar enters your mouth, the bacteria produce acid and your enamel takes a hit that lasts well beyond the snack itself. Give your saliva a few clear hours and it recovers the ground. Snack again before it finishes, and the acid starts over. The more frequently you eat or drink sugary things, the more often the bacteria produce acid. The Australian Dental Association makes the same point in plainer terms: it is not how much sugar you eat that matters most for your teeth, but how often, since each exposure resets the acid clock. The World Health Organization identifies free sugars as the essential dietary factor in tooth decay worldwide, which is part of why its guidance focuses on reducing them. This is why the same chocolate bar does more damage grazed across an afternoon than eaten in one sitting, and why constant sipping on soft drink or juice is one of the harder habits on teeth. From your enamel's point of view, six small sugar hits are worse than one big one. Tooth Decay in Australia Is More Common Than You Think This is not a niche problem. According to Healthdirect, 1 in 3 Australian adults over 15 has tooth decay that is going untreated, and about 1 in 3 children under 5 already have decay in their baby teeth. The AIHW's national oral health data tells a similar story over time, with untreated decay remaining one of the most common preventable health conditions in the country. Baby teeth matter more than their temporary reputation suggests: they hold space for adult teeth and shape how kids eat and speak, and the snacking habits built in childhood tend to be the ones that follow us into adulthood. Healthdirect lists eating a lot of sugary foods and having lots of snacks through the day among the biggest risk factors, alongside skipping regular brushing and check-ups. Diet and dentistry, in other words, are on the same team. The untreated part of that adult statistic deserves a moment too. Early decay has no symptoms, which is exactly why it goes unnoticed: by the time a tooth hurts, the easy window has usually closed. A decay problem caught at the white-spot stage can often still be turned around with the help of saliva and fluoride, which makes the routine check-up less a formality and more the cheapest dental work you will ever have done. Building Tooth-Friendly Habits with Kids Small children do not decide what goes in the trolley or how often snacks appear, which means their teeth are largely a reflection of household rhythm. A few shifts do most of the work: water or plain milk as the everyday drinks, sweet treats attached to mealtimes rather than roaming free between them, and a definite end to eating after the nighttime brush, since saliva flow drops during sleep and gives acid a long, uninterrupted shift. It also helps to be honest about the foods that market themselves as wholesome. Dried fruit straps, muesli bars and juice poppers are lunchbox regulars precisely because they feel healthier than lollies, but from a tooth's perspective a sticky, sugary strap that clings to molars all afternoon is doing very similar work. Sweetness is fine. Sticky, frequent sweetness is the combination to watch. Where Sugar-Free Swaps Fit In Sweetness itself is not the villain. Plaque bacteria feed on sugar, and a sweetener that is not sugar simply gives them nothing to work with. That means the sweet moments you genuinely love do not have to join the acid cycle at all. Swapping the sugar in your tea, coffee and baking for Natvia Natural Sweetener removes those hits from your teeth's daily ledger without removing the pleasure, and for the after-school window, Natvia Fruitti Snacks give kids a genuinely sweet, chewy treat built on real fruit, a far friendlier proposition for small teeth than the sticky lolly-style regulars. If the household sweet tooth is not going anywhere, that is fine. The goal was never to eliminate sweetness from your family's week. It is to change what that sweetness costs, and once the sugar is out of the equation, the cost to your teeth largely goes with it. Your teeth do not need you to be perfect. They need fewer acid attacks, longer recovery windows, and a little help from your shopping list.
Learn more
Everyone's Counting Protein. Here's How Much Fibre You Actually Need a Day
Open any feed right now and protein is the main character: protein coffee, protein pasta, protein everything, tracked to the gram. Fibre does not get that treatment. There is no fibre influencer economy, no fibre-boosted snack aisle takeover. And yet fibre is the nutrient most Australians are actually falling short on, and the one your digestive system is quietly asking about. How Much Fibre Do You Need a Day? According to Better Health Channel, the recommended daily fibre intake is 30g a day for men and 25g a day for women, with children needing between 14g and 28g depending on age. Most Australians consume around 20 to 25g daily, which means a large share of the country is running below target every single day, often without knowing it, because unlike protein, nobody is tracking it. GLNC's own analysis of national intake data backs this up in more granular detail: cereal fibre specifically is one of the biggest shortfalls in the Australian diet. That gap matters more than its low profile suggests. Better Health Channel links low-fibre diets to constipation, irritable bowel syndrome, diverticulitis, heart disease and some cancers, including bowel cancer, and Cancer Council Australia includes a fibre-rich diet among its recommendations for lowering cancer risk. It is a gap worth taking seriously, even if nobody is posting about it. Why Fibre Deserves Equal Attention None of this is a case against protein, which does important work and has earned genuine attention. But wellness is not just one nutrient. Right now the spotlight sits almost entirely on protein, while fibre keeps working quietly in the background: your digestion, your cholesterol, your long-term health. The two are not competitors. A diet can be rich in both. It is simply that fibre is the one currently being overlooked, and the one most Australians are actually falling short on. What Fibre Actually Does in Your Gut This is where fibre earns its overdue moment, because "keeps you regular" undersells it badly. Fibre is the indigestible part of plant foods, and it comes in two broad types that work as a team. Soluble fibre, found in fruit, vegetables, oats and legumes, soaks up water like a sponge, slows digestion, and plays a role in lowering LDL cholesterol. Insoluble fibre, the structural part of plant cell walls, adds bulk and keeps everything moving through the gut at a healthy pace. Then there is the part your gut bacteria are most interested in. Better Health Channel notes that bacteria in the large bowel ferment resistant starch into short-chain fatty acids that are important to bowel health. In other words, fibre is not just passing through; part of it is feeding the microbes that run your digestive system. CSIRO's own gut health research lands on the same point from a different angle: variety across fibre types, not any single hero ingredient, is one of the more reliable levers for a healthier gut microbiome. Because the types work in different ways, variety beats any single hero food: wholegrains, fruit, vegetables and legumes across the week, rather than one bran-heavy breakfast doing all the lifting. Where the Day Actually Loses Its Fibre Apply the protein-tracking mindset to fibre for one ordinary day and the pattern is easy to spot. Breakfast is where most people either bank a solid deposit or start at zero: a wholegrain cereal or oats with fruit gets you meaningfully up the ladder, while white toast with butter contributes very little. Lunch is the meal most likely to be fibre-free by accident, especially if it is something beige from a food court, which is why adding any vegetables, salad or legumes to the middle of the day punches above its weight. Dinner usually carries the most fibre already, since vegetables tend to show up there by default. Then there are snacks, the stretch of day where fibre most easily drops out. The gap between a fruit-based snack and a packet snack, repeated across every afternoon of a working week, quietly decides which side of the recommended intake you land on. You do not need to log any of this in an app. Running the mental audit once is usually enough to spot exactly where your own gap lives, and it is nearly always breakfast or the snack window. Closing the Gap Without Overhauling Your Diet The encouraging news is that a 5 to 10g shortfall is closable with swaps rather than sacrifice, and Healthdirect's guide to high-fibre foods is a good map of where the easy wins live. Moving one daily bread or cereal choice to a wholegrain version does a surprising amount of work on its own, and leaving the skin on fruit and vegetables where you can captures fibre that would otherwise go straight in the compost. Legumes folded into one or two meals a week, lentils into a bolognese, chickpeas into a curry, add more than their modest reputation suggests, and letting a piece of fruit or something plant-based cover one snack window a day instead of a packet option closes most of the remaining distance by itself. The only real rule is to go gradually and drink plenty of water, since a sudden fibre jump is harder on the gut than a steady climb. Snacks are honestly the easiest lever, because most default snack foods contribute almost nothing. This is a moment where Natvia Fruitti Snacks pull their weight: chewy fruit-based bites that are a good source of fibre, turning an afternoon treat into a small, pleasant deposit toward the daily target. Keep a pouch somewhere the 3pm version of you will actually find it. The Quiet Achiever Deserves a Spot on Your Plate Protein will be fine; it has an entire industry advocating for it. Fibre is relying on you. The good news is that it asks very little: a couple of swaps, a bit of variety, and snacks that contribute instead of coasting. Your feed may never celebrate it, but your gut, your heart and your future self will all register the difference. Start with one swap this week and build from there, and next time a wellness conversation turns to grams of protein, feel free to be the person who asks the room how their fibre is tracking.
Learn more
